July flood alert: 20 States at risk despite N620bn intervention

The Nigerian Meteorological Agency has issued a flood alert for the month of July, warning that States including Sokoto, Lagos, Edo, Benue, and 16 others are at risk of experiencing flash floods.

This came as the Africa Environmental Health Organisation, climate change adaptation researchers, and members of the Nigerian Institute of Town Planners, among others, lambasted state governments following the recent devastating floods that ravaged several states, calling for an intense scrutiny over the management of ecological funds allocated to affected regions.

Findings showed that despite receiving over N620bn in ecological funds, many states seem ill-prepared to mitigate the impact of such disasters, raising questions about the effectiveness of these funds in enhancing environmental resilience and disaster preparedness.

NiMet’s flash flood risk alert for July 2025, released on Monday by the agency, showed the states with varying probable risks of experiencing flash flooding events due to the onset of rainfall across the country.

The agency said, “Sokoto State has a high risk of experiencing flash floods. Other states with notable risk of flash flooding are Kaduna, Zamfara, Yobe, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Jigawa, Adamawa, Taraba, Niger, Nasarawa, Benue, Ogun, Ondo, Lagos, Delta, Edo, Cross River, Rivers and Akwa Ibom.”

The agency advised residents of the states to relocate if necessary, clear drainage systems, prepare emergency kits, turn off electricity and gas during flooding, strengthen mudslide prevention, and promote community awareness.

This came as residents of some Ondo communities affected by the flood that occurred last week have called on the state government on Monday to come to their aid following the destruction of their property.

The flood occurred as a result of a downpour on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, which has reportedly destroyed property worth millions of naira in communities in Owo, Okitipupa, Ilaje, and Ese Odo Local Government Areas of the state.

It was gathered that the flood destroyed buildings and submerged bridges in the affected communities of Uso, Ayeka, Ikoya, Igbodigo, Igodan, and Igbotako.

One of the victims in the Okitipupa community, Mr Joshua Jemiloni, said, “The flooding was caused by erosion flowing down from Igodan, coupled with the fact that the Igodan stream along the road overflowed its banks during the torrential downpour. It affected about 10 buildings.”

Similarly, a community leader in Igbodigo, in Okitipupa Local Government, Lawrence Awanebi, who expressed shock at the level of destruction, also called on the government to urgently assist those rendered homeless by the flood.

Also, the Chairman of Owo Local Government, Tope Omolayo, appealed to the Federal Government, the Ondo State Government, and relevant emergency agencies to intervene swiftly.

The State Governor, Lucky Aiyedatiwa, had earlier said the government had commenced initiatives that would reduce floods and other natural disasters by dredging the waterways across the state.

“As a government, we shall continue with initiatives that will reduce the effects of floods and other natural disasters by dredging our waterways and enforcing environmental sanitation laws,” he stated.

Despite receiving over N620bn in ecological funds, many states seem ill-prepared to mitigate the impact of such disasters, raising questions about the effectiveness of these funds in enhancing environmental resilience and disaster preparedness.

The funds, meant to support environmental sustainability and disaster management initiatives, appear to have fallen short of their intended purpose, leaving communities vulnerable to recurring flood disasters.

Critics argue that the allocation and utilisation of ecological funds should be transparent and subject to regular audits to ensure that the money is being used for its intended purpose. The lack of accountability and oversight in the management of these funds has led to concerns about potential misappropriation and inefficiency.

As the nation grapples with the aftermath of the floods, there is a growing demand for greater transparency and accountability in the management of ecological funds to prevent similar disasters in the future and ensure that affected communities receive the support they need to recover and rebuild.